The Impossibility of Strategyproof Rank Aggregation
by Manuel Eberl and Patrick Lederer
In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2026 (to appear)
Abstract:
In rank aggregation, the goal is to combine multiple input rankings into a single output ranking. In this paper, we analyze rank aggregation methods, so-called social welfare functions (SWFs), with respect to strategyproofness, which requires that no agent can misreport his ranking to obtain an output ranking that is closer to his true ranking in terms of the Kemeny distance. As our main result, we show that no anonymous SWF satisfies unanimity and strategyproofness when there are at least four alternatives. This result is proven by SAT solving, a computer-aided theorem proving technique, and verified by Isabelle, a highly trustworthy interactive proof assistant. Further, we prove by hand that strategyproofness is incompatible with majority consistency, a variant of Condorcet-consistency for SWFs. Lastly, we show that all SWFs in two natural classes have a large incentive ratio and are thus highly manipulable.
Note:
arXiv version available under 10.48550/arXiv.2602.06582
Download preprint PDF (736 KiB)
BibTeX:
@inproceedings{el26,
author = {Manuel Eberl and Patrick Lederer},
title = {The Impossibility of Strategyproof Rank Aggregation},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the {AAMAS} 2026},
series = {AAMAS '26},
year = {To appear},
sortyear = {2026}
}